Well. I'm outta the mix. I'm infertile. Past my prime.
That's okay, though. I'll keep ridin' here on Earth.
We have assigned you to security
Well. I'm outta the mix. I'm infertile. Past my prime.
That's okay, though. I'll keep ridin' here on Earth.
No the idea is to permanently sever ties with Earth. No return, no communication, nothing. This is so the generations born on the new planet will never know about Earth or the evils in this world and a new & better society can be created. Certain technologies that exist on Earth will intentionally be left behind. No nuclear bombs, no nuclear power plants, not even atom splitting.just install a real-time hyperspace link from your new planets admin server to a server on earth somewhere, then you can just hook up google if you need to learn something.
Alternatively, run out a fibre optic cable behind you as you fly.
@Duck....is your science officer...?Your our science officer Duck. Make note of this

Earth history was full of wars because there were many different countries, different religions, different languages, different races, etc. The Chinese & the European white men both set out to take over the world at one point or another.I'd tell 'em. Those who do not know their history are bound to repeat it.
Earth history was full of wars because there were many different countries, different religions, different languages, different races, etc. The Chinese & the European white men both set out to take over the world at one point or another.
Expansion of empires encountered primitive native tribes & there were wars to wipe them out & take their land.
There were was between even similar types of societies, who had nothing to fight over except land or resources.
Well if a new society of carefully chosen people were settling a new planet and there are no other intelligent species such as humans who were there first (no natives) and everybody arriving on that space ship was of the same race & religion & spoke the same language & there was a single government & everyone can go forth & multiply while maintaining the same bonds, how would it turn out?
Look at the United States. With the exception of having natives to deal with, it was pretty much a bunch of people from the same part of Europe who came & it was basically a land-grabbing free-for-all. Multiple colonies & states were created, and there were wars among & directly with the countries they came from, but in this case the country (planet) we came from wouldn't even know where we went so they couldn't send NASA out to come bully us & make us pay taxes on intergalactic tea.
And with Skateboard being a commie, that'll be fine at first. He'll be long dead by the time the society is large enough that 100% pure communism no longer works. The best economic system for a small, isolated civilization consisting of people who are 100% dependent on one other's contributions, is communism. There would be no monetary system to start with & it wouldn't even matter. The guys who are building the shelters won't have time to study the plant life to figure out what we can eat. The botanists who are doing that, won't be able to operate the greenhouses containing earth soil to produce the edible plant species brought from Earth for food. So others will have to work in the greenhouses to feed everyone while the botanists are learning which native species we can eat, and how to grow them. The guys raising the cows we brought from Earth so we can have meat until the biologists can figure out what native animals we can eat, will have to feed everybody with meat until the biologists finish their work. The explorers will be wandering around the planet in some kind of aircraft to study the geography, so they will have to keep coming back for food & fuel that was produced by others. Communism is the only way that would work.
But once a bigger civilization develops, and the population is high enough that the actions & productivity of each individual person can't be monitored by everyone else, you'll end up with lazy people mooching off others & greedy authority figures hoarding supplies & stuff so at that point a better system like capitalism will have to be introduced, so each person doesn't get everything for free & has to produce something in exchange for money to use to buy the goods & services of others.
However a system of representation with checks & balances for the other functions of government, along with a permanent judicial system can be introduced immediately.
Not talking about today's left-wing communism. I'm talking about the "commune" stuff the hippies tried & failed to work out in the 60's. They failed because they were lazy worthless drug-addict idiots. And I was only referring to the economic system in which there is no currency. It doesn't make any sense to have a monetary system in what's basically an outpost with 100 people.Communisim? No, Autocracy is better. With communism you still have politics, idealism, backstabbing and political betrayal amidst the administrators.
Not all of us. Just some. The ones who read way too many Cinderella stories and actually started to believe them. Most of us have sense enough to realize weddings are as commercial as Valentines Day- and as meaningless...............
What the hell is it with women?
..............
Seems the holdup on the remodel is getting permits from the city. A hoochie-house has no problem getting permits. A restaurant, on the other hand.... Guess we can see where the priorities are here.
I believe Bella's Hacienda is a registered and licensed hoochie-house. I have no problem with legal prostitution. Far as I see it, those ladies provide a public service. If they can make a good living at it, more power to 'em. It's no different, IMO, than a woman marrying for money. Only difference is the one who married for it has to sleep with the same boring, boorish, selfish jerk every night and has to act "respectable." Women in a legal prostitution business get to have a lot more fun. Hell, I'd probably join 'em if I was a lot younger and more desireable. Probably be a waste of time now that I'm an old bag in my 40s.But what if the hoochie-house doesn't need any permits? From your comment I infer that the hoochie-house is not on the radar screen of the local officials. And speaking as an old city and borough (in Alaska we have boroughs instead of counties and of course most are disfunctional) executive, what's with a government that doesn't mess with a perfectly respectable business such as a hoochie-house? I say impeach every one of them from the mayor to the dogcatcher for not messing up something that appears to work and causes no apparent harm. The Honorable Harry Reid will fix 'em when he finds out. He'll get them "workers" and "patrons" free health care...or something. He'll even pay for it with an airbag tax on trucks. Kind of like an "Airbags for Windbags" tax.
That almost sounds as bad as actually having to attend the wedding. I mostly RSVP NO! How come you are not attending our wedding 6 months from now? Because I am going to be on a hot load that absolutely must get there 6 months from now. LOL...so, I'm in getting some breakfast and there's this poor guy sitting with two women. They're all in the same generation as Duck's Geezer. The one woman went on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about some wedding. The bride forgot her flowers and the dress was blah blah blah there were stairs yap yap yap yap yap, somebody brought blab blab blab blab blab, groom, preacher.....Poor guy was in agony.
Then, one of his friends came in and now he gets to talk about hunting. And I get to hear about something other than the color of the cake and who tripped on the steps to the reception hall.
I believe Bella's Hacienda is a registered and licensed hoochie-house. I have no problem with legal prostitution. Far as I see it, those ladies provide a public service. If they can make a good living at it, more power to 'em. It's no different, IMO, than a woman marrying for money. Only difference is the one who married for it has to sleep with the same boring, boorish, selfish jerk every night and has to act "respectable." Women in a legal prostitution business get to have a lot more fun. Hell, I'd probably join 'em if I was a lot younger and more desireable. Probably be a waste of time now that I'm an old bag in my 40s.
Point is, I don't think Bella's is an under-the-radar operation.
Going to Bella's....hiring a lawyer...Can't argue with your view of hoochie houses and the profession.
You note that you're an undesirable "old bag". Regardless of the accuracy of that statement, that observation tends to illustrate the perversity of males. Males die off sooner so it seems that they should attempt to cohabit (ain't that diplomatic?) with women older than themselves. Were that the case, couples could die off fairly close together in time instead of the geezer leaving his sweet young thing to make it on her own for years without some support. But there's not much logic to human relationships. Evolutionary biologists have a contrary opinion, but I'm just talking about such a little thing as responsibility -- not that I want to be responsible.
It sees like the owners of the planned Iron Skillet might want to consult with the Bella's folks and find out how Bella's isn't hassled. Probably be cheaper than paying lawyers.