ironpony
Professional Pot-Stirrer
Their end goal is to get out of paying drivers.
If they tried to transition to driverless trucks right now, there would be too much resistance.
The plan is to bite the bullet now, continue to pay drivers to babysit trucks while adding a hundred grand or so to the cost of the trucks, then wait til the general public gets used to the idea of having robot trucks behind them.
Then eventually they'll start phasing out the humans altogether, successfully destroying an entire industry in the name of greed.
Yep, but its going quite some time before the general public accepts the idea of a robotic truck on public highways. They're scared turdless of big trucks as it is without having a mindless iBot behind the wheel.
I don't expect to see driverless trucks, at least not in my lifetime. Google just released a report on their driverless vehicles, and it tells me all I really need to know. Google realizes that a world full of driverless cars is not going to be a good idea, just imagine turning 80,000 pound trucks loose.
There have been multiple accidents in these driverless cars, though none have been the fault of the car itself, always somebody else, which is where the problem lies.
When it comes to accidents, it really doesn't matter who is at fault. People are going to make mistakes and potentially cause accidents. a car, or truck, that is being handled by a competent driver, almost always sees the mistakes made by others and has the time to perform whatever evasive action is necessary to avoid a collision.
The driverless truck, as perfect as that computer may be, can't look into an intersection and anticipate that a person is not paying attention and is about to turn right in front of them. They don't see the car flying up the sidestreet paying no attention to a red light. They don't see that some idiot left a sprinkler running while the outside temperature dropped to 26 Degrees and froze all the water that sprayed onto the road, so right through that red light they will slide.
When you take the human ability to anticipate the actions of others, you are going to have massive, deadly accidents. Just a couple of these accidents will put a trucking company out of business once a lawyer gets done with that minor little fact that nobody was controlling the truck.
Lots of big ideas sound good on paper, only to be squashed at some point once a little bit of common sense comes into play.
I think well see applications for off road use, mining for instance, and truck platooning with a driver staring at the truck ahead of him first.
. google and Volvo and Mercedes is ponying up to accept liability why don't the truck manufactures


)
. why not encourage people to goto school and get a degree so they can support themselves