Ultimately, it was endless debates with engineering.
There was quite a bit of concerns with startability by these guys, even though the spec sheets show identical numbers regarding this. It was explained that the stats they provided me are simply based on HP and Torque ratings, but that startability would be better with the DD15. They were really pushing me to go with lower rear axle gears and an OD trans. OD trans is out of the question, as my goal is to operate in direct drive, and dropping down to a 2.28 rear axle ratio won't work for what I want the truck to do. Personally, I think the DD13 would perform just fine, but it's enough of a concern to think about.
Fuel economy: It was acknowledged that the DD13, with the gear setup I want, would do a tiny bit better on flat land, but any gains would be lost if I operate very much in hills. Well, I'm in Northwest Arkansas and everything I take off with each week puts me immediately in hills along I44. Combine that with my desire to run more out west once I get another truck, and I will see even more hills. Both motors will perform fine, but I'm likely not going to see any net gain in fuel economy unless I stay in the midwest.
Resale value: In the end, this was the tiebreaker. By the time this truck reaches 5 years old, it will likely be in the hands of another driver. Resale value on the truck is more than $5k better with the DD15, so the ROI is in favor of the bigger motor here. Same reason I went with duals over wide singles. I felt fine with the wide singles, and was leaning toward them, but they are a deterrent when it comes to resale. Talking to dealers around here, they will actually pull the singles off and put dual on whatever they are trying to sell on the used lot.