Objectionable behaviors, often found at truckstops, PT.1:


Thank you everyone for responding. i would like to address some issues that have been brought up:

1) What i meant by sleeping around was, if you want to sleep around then i feel this is ok IF YOU ARE NOT MARRIED and if everyone else involved is also not married. So my point is if you want to sleep around, then why not just sleep around and not get married. i suspect that a large reason why many divorces take place is due to trying to do both simultaneously.


Fine. I'll bite. I never got married with the intention of getting divorced later.

First marriage started pretty good. The only dark spot was his parents. He was 33 when we got married, but his parents treated him like he was 15. We left the country because of his military duty. The distance was good. We returned to the States and, even though we were over 1,000 miles from them, their presence loomed in my household.

My own immaturity and lack of self confidence definitely did not help. I did not feel like a productive and valued member of the family. This was my own shortcoming. I listened too much to the opinion of his father and allowed myself to be dragged so far down that I thought he would be better off without me. So I left. The divorce wasn't filed until almost three years later.

Second marriage lasted about nine months. You don't really know people until you live with them. The next time you walk in on your spouse engaging in deviant behavior with an animal, you tell me how much longer that marriage will last. I was so sickened by it that I never, ever said another word to him. I moved out that day.

Third marriage, I became a truck driver and he became lonely. We're still good friends, just not married anymore.

2) Yes. That's probably the direction i'm getting at. i suspect it's usually the man's fault and in this case it sort of indictifies my next point. i think women tend to be more monogamous then men tend to be. So, it's usually the man that has wandering lusts. In this case, it just happened to be with another species. Actually, if it's not too prying i could use a little more info.

Hey Butter..... I'll take my neighbors in this Trailer Park any day and twice on Sunday over many of the sanctimonious bastards in the "upper crust" housing devlopments and "gated communities" I've seen. Everybody here helps each other in time of trouble and leaves you alone when you need it. We're all working people making do as best we can. Some youngsters just starting out, some older folks, some of us slowly winding down. None of us are in foreclosure nor struggling to make payments on houses that are two or three times more expensive than they're worth. I've looked close at many of those $250,000 and up "dream palaces" that the "good people" are in and they ain't one bit better constructed than the trailer I live in. You gotta be an idiot to buy one of those overpriced shacks.

So stuff it brother.

Certainly i don't mean to imply that ALL people that live in trailers engage in the behaviours on the list, but by and large a huge proportion of them do vs. the general population. For example, you just don't see people in silicon valley or berkley or westchester county getting cars repo'd, you don't see instances of having 6 different kids with 7 different women and yes this is biologically possible---will explain how later. You don't see men living with children who are not biologically his on a large common scale, you just don't see irresponsible type behaviour in these types of communities where by and large in trailer areas you do tend to see them in high percentage.
 
Certainly i don't mean to imply that ALL people that live in trailers engage in the behaviours on the list, but by and large a huge proportion of them do vs. the general population. For example, you just don't see people in silicon valley or berkley or westchester county getting cars repo'd, you don't see instances of having 6 different kids with 7 different women and yes this is biologically possible---will explain how later. You don't see men living with children who are not biologically his on a large common scale, you just don't see irresponsible type behaviour in these types of communities where by and large in trailer areas you do tend to see them in high percentage.

That whole "trailer trash" thing is just a stereotype.

You're using Berkeley as an example of moral decency? Berkeley, CA?? Are you serious?

And what's with this 6 kids w/7 women thing? Are you talking about that thing where the doctors take one woman's egg & put it in another?
 
That whole "trailer trash" thing is just a stereotype.

a) disagree based on personal observations. Certainly not everyone who lives in a trailer is lame. It's the percentage that gives trailer dwelling a bad name.

You're using Berkeley as an example of moral decency? Berkeley, CA?? Are you serious?

b) Yes. i define moral decency as Is what you are doing hurting anyone? Not the behavior itself. For instance, in cases of divorce it is usually one person that did something objectionable or is acting objectionable to the other person. If you sleep around and produce many different kids with different women, this is not good for the family construct----the children are not being benefited, and most likely shunted, because of this---will any of the children have stable parenting? As opposed to sleeping around but not producing multiple different children with multiple different women. See the difference?

And what's with this 6 kids w/7 women thing? Are you talking about that thing where the doctors take one woman's egg & put it in another?

No, but now that you brought it up, yes this could be a way to have a certain number of children with a greater number of mothers. I.e., 5 kids with 6 mothers, 6 kids with 7 mothers etc. i don't feel the way i know would be appropriate to mention at this time. It does, however, involve having 6 (or any number greater than 1) kids with 7 (or any number 2 or greater) mothers BIOLOGICALLY. Whereas the egg implant method does not mean you had 6 kids with 7 different women biologically. Although you did have them with 7 different women.
 
[MENTION=9702]butter[/MENTION]

As for more information, you can f'kn forget it. I have no need to relive the details and you won't be getting your willies off my unpleasant experience.

Regarding your assertion that poor people have lower family values than middle class or rich people, you are so incredibly FOS it would be pathetic if it wasn't so offensive.

What a piece of.... work... you are!
 
No, but now that you brought it up, yes this could be a way to have a certain number of children with a greater number of mothers. I.e., 5 kids with 6 mothers, 6 kids with 7 mothers etc. i don't feel the way i know would be appropriate to mention at this time. It does, however, involve having 6 (or any number greater than 1) kids with 7 (or any number 2 or greater) mothers BIOLOGICALLY. Whereas the egg implant method does not mean you had 6 kids with 7 different women biologically. Although you did have them with 7 different women.

What in the hell are you talking about? 6 kids with 7 biological mothers, .... 1 kid with 2 biological mothers, ...

If you're not talking about some kind of laboratory thing done by fertility doctors, I have no idea what you're talking about.
 
BTW butters, not all truck drivers are trashy. That is just a stereotype. For your information, I went to Rose-Hulman for 3 years. How many trashy people do you know that can afford a $60000 a year school? Despite the fact I have inherited allot of money, I do not place myself above others, and will never downplay or degrade another driver. We work hard every day to keep America moving and just face it, without the drivers, you have no Berkeley, no BMWs, or anything above a 3rd world economy.
 
No that would be more children than mothers. He's talking about one child with 2 mothers.

No, goofball...the women being identical twins. Biologically, they are carbon copies of each other and their DNA indistinguishable. Therefore, it is impossible for a laboratory to determine which woman is the child's mother. Biologically, they are both mothers to the child.
 
Hmmmmmmm........he might be on to something.
My mom lives in a trailer park..........and she's living with a man she's not married to.........and I think there are others there doing the same.

But she's over 75, so I reckon she can do what she wants.:rolllaugh:
 
No, goofball...the women being identical twins. Biologically, they are carbon copies of each other and their DNA indistinguishable. Therefore, it is impossible for a laboratory to determine which woman is the child's mother. Biologically, they are both mothers to the child.

So Butters thinks it's wrong or immoral to knock up a chick who has an identical twin sister?




Weirdo!
 
a) disagree based on personal observations. Certainly not everyone who lives in a trailer is lame. It's the percentage that gives trailer dwelling a bad name.

From what you're saying here it appears that you don't live in a trailer and yet most of what you speak is jibberish....So are we to assume that anyone that does not live in a trailer is a hyper-judgemental fool?
 
1) What i am saying, in general, is yes poorer people have tend to have less values then the more affluent. Not ALL poor people. And of course lots of rich people have the stuff screwed up too---witness the enrons and the maddoffs etc.
a) Never said all truck drivers are trashy
b) Anyone that is taking offense from any of this may have to honestly evaluate and examine themselves. Otherwise there is no need to be offended if most of the things on the list do not apply to you.

2) No, that's ok if you don't wish to relive; Thanks for responding anyways. Now, from a woman's perspective do you feel that it's mostly the man's fault?

3) The identical twin thing won't work as technically only one of the women actually had the child. Again, i do not think it is appropriate to reveal the methodology right now, but the trailer folks know it because they are the experts at it. i think we should forget this aspect for now and focus on the divorce thing.
 
No, I do not think it is the man's fault on any higher percentage level than the woman's. Infidelity has far more aspects to it than simple lust. When a man (or woman) seeks entertainment outside the marriage, there are almost always underlying problems within the marriage itself. It is more complex than simple sex, in most cases.

Additionally, there are more reasons divorces happen than extramarital affairs. The responsibility is shared equally between the genders.
 
My theory is that "they" get bored of having sex with each other and that's why divorce happens. Now, since women can generally have the ability to be monogamous more so then men, my theory is that it's usually the man's fault.

i don't see what else it could be. i mean you actually went thru the ceremony of marriage and you didn't "know" this person? Really?
 

Back
Top