What’s the deal with how he got his CDL?Should have been a full 25 years.
And they need to charge the person that gave him the cdl.
But I'm not holding my breath.
What’s the deal with how he got his CDL?Should have been a full 25 years.
And they need to charge the person that gave him the cdl.
But I'm not holding my breath.
He doesn’t speak the same language as them so therefore he’s a fourth class person.What’s the deal with how he got his CDL?

Don't give a flying hoot where he's from, or what language he speaks. To me, it's not about how he got in the situation he was in, but the deadly choice at the end that earned him prison time.He doesn’t speak the same language as them so therefore he’s a fourth class person.![]()
From what I read,he couldn't understand or speak English so he should've been denied a CDL.What’s the deal with how he got his CDL?
They stopped enforcement of that law over 6 years ago.From what I read,he couldn't understand or speak English so he should've been denied a CDL.
"Keppler said the language requirement was removed this year because lacking command of a language does not create an “imminent hazard” or place a driver in “imminent danger of a crash.”
It wasn't imminent. It was miles after the runaway ramp signs.seems to me, in this situation, there was an "imminent hazard", since the driver could not understand English..??


it was imminent, had he been able to read, he would have taken the ramp.It wasn't imminent. It was miles after the runaway ramp signs.![]()
You can say it as many times as you want, but that still won't make it true.it was imminent, had he been able to read, he would have taken the ramp.
then again, a cold blooded murderer has no desire to obey the laws, rules, signage.
You can say it as many times as you want, but that still won't make it true.
Geez give it a rest…seems to me, in this situation, there was an "imminent hazard", since the driver could not understand English..??
It's still a violation, just not an OOS.They stopped enforcement of that law over 6 years ago.
CVSA Removes English Requirement In Updated Out-of-Service Guidelines - TT
Roadside inspectors no longer will place Mexican or Canadian commercial vehicle drivers operating in the United States out of service if they are unable to communicate in English, according to new Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance “tolerance guidelines.”www.ttnews.com
“While it remains a violation, one that should be recorded — as all violations at the roadside should be recorded — we agree that particular one does not constitute an imminent hazard,” DeBruyne said.
I agreed with ten but 25 would be okay too.Should have been a full 25 years.
And they need to charge the person that gave him the cdl.
But I'm not holding my breath.