This is Why Diabetes and Driving Don't Mix


I have repeatedly said the best answer for roads is to privatize them but asshole slam shut so hard over that idea my keyboard bends
Yeah let's just put toll booths on every street corner. :confused:

Private roads means an entity profits from them. Meaning they charge a toll higher than it would cost to maintain them. Billionaires get rich at our expense.

Public roads means, in theory anyway, that the entity that maintains them only taxes what it costs to break even after maintenance.

So in theory, we're better off with public roads than toll roads.

And I say "in theory" because the government entity is corrupt and inefficient,resulting in high taxes and funding shortages due to outright theft of public funds.

The only practical solution for highway funding is a serious (for real) reform of how the current taxes are spent, followed by general population prison terms for every politician and bureaucrat who's ever stolen from the cookie jar. :mad:

Without the theft and misuse of funds, once they get caught up replacing bridges, they could actually lower the taxes.

The very first thing those Australian billionaires did when they leased the Indiana turnpike was raise the tolls. F*** privately owned toll roads.
 
Sure because there is not going to be any benefits @Blood. The math does not lie. Another 15 years and SS as it stands will cave. Soon after the stock markets are gonna tank as a mass sell off from retiree's hits. Gonna be a bunch of dead broke people looking to the Government for relief and your gonna see a comple tree shift over to a pure socialist republic.

I don't disagree and I don't know how we're going to avoid it...
I mean within the realm of possibility.
If there is a way, we don't have the will to peruse it or the clout to persist.

But you're still side-stepping the question by proposing that there won't be anything to draw.

If you retire after being forced to pay premiums for 50 years will you decline the check on moral grounds?
Yes or no.
 
Nope. I'll recoupe what ever I am able to. Same as when I take each and every deduction I can. Keep as many of my transactions in the barter realm as I can.

But I still would advocate then and now an end to the farce of it.
 
I define "government overreach" as that huge chunk of money that disappears from my back account every year to pay for those who wont pay for themselves ;)

But yeah, in all seriousness, I agree with you.
I like the idea that if I have to pay for your first kid I can pay for two more surgeries. We spay and neuter them. Well whatever the human equivalent is anyways.
 
Nope. I'll recoupe what ever I am able to. Same as when I take each and every deduction I can. Keep as many of my transactions in the barter realm as I can.

But I still would advocate then and now an end to the farce of it.

I'm right there with you...
which makes us like most everyone else who takes a high moral tone at no personal cost.
That is the root of our troubles IMO.

It's a no-win situation unless one is willing to go completely off the reservation.
 
Maybe. But few advocate an immediate end. Be it today, tomorrow next year.......

It is a plain fact that they have been robbing from junior to pay for gramps. Now Gramps is living longer, junior is earning less ( proportionally ) and the puke politicians like Trump and Sanders are just advocating raising the ceiling to cover it. Or to put it bluntly steal more money to keep the scam alive for another 30 years.
 
And what about those of us without medical insurance?
Do you support the ACA ?
And if not what is your (realistic) solution equivalent to removing us from becoming a public liability?

Easy: Either buy health insurance or do what I do, which is pay cash for my medical care and be responsible for my own health. It's not my responsibility to powder your butt.
 
Easy: Either buy health insurance or do what I do, which is pay cash for my medical care and be responsible for my own health. It's not my responsibility to powder your butt.

I do the same as you.
The point [that you missed] was what to do about people who don't maintain health insurance.

If we are going to deny people the 'privilege' of driving for failing to maintain auto insurance then why shouldn't we develop punitive measures for those who fail to maintain health insurance?

After all, what happens if somebody takes you out on your scooter and you end up in a coma for 6 months?

Are you going to pay that out of pocket?

If we're going to mandate auto insurance why not mandate enough to cover worst case?

I think the minimum medical is still around $25k in some states.
Why not a million?
Why not 20 million?
Why not a billion?

Why not mandate renters insurance so people don't have to rely on social services after a catastrophe?

Why not mandate stress insurance so when you get so pissed off about all the mandates that you can't function you don't have to go on disability?
:)
 
Easy: Either buy health insurance or do what I do, which is pay cash for my medical care and be responsible for my own health. It's not my responsibility to powder your butt.

That is what I have been doing, but the penalties for 2016 may be too high for me to continue that.
 
I don't GAF who thinks diabetics can keep 100% control of their condition. I'll bet anything this driver thought he had it together. There is no way to predict what will cause a hypoglycemic event or when it will happen. If you're diabetic, turn in your keys.

Cop Jumps Onto Moving Big Rig To Save Unresponsive Driver
I know one who lost lots of Weight and is off Medication now. just with Diet and Exercise can he keep Control of his Blood Sugar
 

Back
Top