Not technically- the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness doesn't have any caveats- the courts are known for being wrong on many assumptions- they are, after all, lawyers, who pay others to teach them to lie, albeit legally- they rely heavily on interpretation which can't exist without definition which is usually ignored- ala Bill Clinton expressing it depends on what is means- if indeed our rights are guaranteed to be protected by the constitution, please explain the HSA- the NDAA extensions, etc.
We have the right to pursue- liberty- in today's world that means automobiles/trucks/planes etc. Laws are designed to punish the many for the actions of the few- if one causes a wreck that causes harm to person or property will a license change the accountability? Answer: No. will adhering to rules meant to control change the accountability? Answer: No. Why? because laws are meant for punishment AFTER an event. Laws against prevent 0- but they do line the coffers of law writers and give LEO's opportunity to act a fool.