There are probably certain portions of trucking that would benefit from union involvement.
Right up until the point where it gets out of hand, as it always does.
I remember my dad saying things like, “You could haul Christmas trees, but if they put a wire around it, it was a manufactured product and a non union outfit was not allowed to touch it.”
Which of course opened he door for massive fraud and bribery at scale houses, etc.
Regarding modern food grade tankering, I went to a dairy in Coopersville, MI a few times hauling Caustic Soda. I was he only chemical tanker there. But there were TONS of food grade guys lined up to go in the building. Most of he same lined up when I scaled in, unloaded, and still there when I left.
Are they being paid for that time thatseating away your 14? How’s that work with eLogs? Does that facility provide parking when you inevitably run out your hours sitting there?
Just more things to consider.
Regarding certain portions of the trucking industry: I think that you're right. From what I recall, the railroads wanted trucking put under the ICC because then tariffs would have to be published that would identify what was hauled and where it was hauled and who would haul it. That led to such things as what I observed. Recall that I mentioned Post Transportation, a contract carrier for then Stauffer Chemical. Post likely died with regulation and the Stauffer (sulfuric) acid plant in Martinez, CA was recently owned by the giant Solvay S.A. out of Brussels and is not in the hands of some private equity firm, Rhodia.
Post had rubber-lined trailers for HCl, HF, et al. But as noted, it didn't have general ICC authority; it had only contract authority -- whatever Stauffer made, it could haul. My old lash-up, CF, had lots of tanker authority, e.g. it could and did haul 190 proof whiskey out of N. Vancouver, B.C. to bottlers in Fresno, Sausolito, or wherever.
There was a demand for the fluoride compound for treating drinking water and maybe making toothpaste -- I'm guessing that Colgate plant in Berkeley might have produced toothpaste but I don't know. The supply came out of some plant in Trail, B.C. But the company that had trailers capable of hauling hexafluorosilicic acid, Post, could not haul the stuff as it had no authority to do so. So Post leased the authority to haul the stuff from CF. So once in a while one could see the pretty gray (Post painted its tractors with Imron so they tended to look shiny and waxed) Post 3-axle conventional KWs with various CF decorations on them.
That's how ridiculous some regulation was. Its present day analog may be those folks who buy up patents for vitally-needed medicine then boost the prices into the stratosphere.
Humans job any system that they create. That's the best reason to sunset all government agencies other than those providing safety. And they should be watched like hawks.
Regarding food grade tankering versus NaOH tankering at any location: That's an easy one. The company attorney sees that hazmat sticker and instructs management and staff to get rid of your caustic a** for fear of the EPA, OSHA (does that acronym still stand for Oh S** Here Again?), a conniving employee, visitor, or trucker, or a lurking lawyer. Let them food grade yankers rot -- little liability there.
Old style regulation unintentionally produced one benefit for the driver. Most of the tariffs had a provision for demurrage, so there was a price to pay for delay.
Don't know anything about ELD logging. It sounds like a bunch of Big Brother crap. Those who ginned it up should rot wherever.