I wonder if the people writing the regulations at the EPA ever considered that particulate emissions contribute to "mirror top" clouds that reflect some sunlight back into space, basically cooling the planet at a time when greenhouse gasses are supposedly overheating it. In a sense, some diesel emissions could be a good thing.
At the same time, some folks are saying that the particulate filter, Nox and Pee systems are costing us 2-3 mpg. Getting rid of this stuff could avoid the burning of hundreds of millions of gallons of diesel per year, with a significant reduction of CO2 (greenhouse gas) as a result. Another good thing.
What am I missing? Why is this so hard for the government to figure out?
There are smarter places in the economy to fight the smog wars. I think there would be a fantastic benefit from deleting some of the smog stuff and instead running full aero packages and wide base (super) singles.
Thoughts?
At the same time, some folks are saying that the particulate filter, Nox and Pee systems are costing us 2-3 mpg. Getting rid of this stuff could avoid the burning of hundreds of millions of gallons of diesel per year, with a significant reduction of CO2 (greenhouse gas) as a result. Another good thing.
What am I missing? Why is this so hard for the government to figure out?
There are smarter places in the economy to fight the smog wars. I think there would be a fantastic benefit from deleting some of the smog stuff and instead running full aero packages and wide base (super) singles.
Thoughts?