Werner Enterprises Sees Major Truck Reduction Amid Q3 2024 Revenue Decline

In its third quarter 2024 financial report, Werner Enterprises revealed significant challenges in maintaining revenue and operational efficiency. Key figures highlighted a 9% decrease in total revenue, down to $745.7 million compared to the same period in 2023. The trucking giant experienced reduced earnings across various sectors, with the most pronounced impact observed in its Truckload Transportation Services (TTS) segment.

Revenue Declines and Fleet Reductions

Werner’s TTS revenue dropped by $49.4 million (9%) year-over-year. This decrease was driven in part by lower fuel surcharge revenues, which fell by $20 million. Net of these fuel charges, the company’s total revenue saw a 7% decline. The reduction in fleet size played a significant role, with an average of 7,414 trucks in service during Q3 2024—a stark drop of 812 trucks (9.9%) from the previous year. At the quarter’s end, total trucks were down 8.9% year-over-year.

Operational and Profit Metrics

The company’s operating income decreased by 54%, falling to $17.6 million. Operating margins also took a hit, dropping 220 basis points to 2.4%. Adjusted operating income reflected a 48% decline at $21.6 million, with an adjusted margin of 2.9%.

Net income attributable to Werner suffered a significant 72% reduction, coming in at $6.6 million. This led to a diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.11, down 72% from Q3 2023. The adjusted EPS also fell by 64%, ending at $0.15.

Sector-Specific Challenges

The TTS segment experienced a notable decrease in average revenues per truck per week, despite a slight year-over-year increase of 3.5%. The dedicated segment saw an 8.5% reduction in average trucks in service and a 6.9% decline in revenue. Average revenues per truck in the dedicated fleet rose modestly by 1.7%.

The Werner Logistics segment also faced hurdles, with revenue down 10% to $206.8 million and an adjusted operating income decline of 75% to $0.8 million. Challenges included lower brokerage volumes, competitive pricing, and reduced revenue per shipment in the intermodal category.

Cost Management and Future Outlook

Operational cost management included a 27% decrease in capital expenditures, which fell to $87.9 million compared to the $120 million from the previous year. This financial strategy helped maintain the average age of trucks at two years and trailers at 5.2 years.

CEO Derek Leathers emphasized the company’s ongoing structural adaptations to improve efficiency and cost savings. While freight conditions remained challenging, there was slight improvement due to late-quarter disruptions caused by hurricanes.

The company’s future guidance indicates a continued focus on optimizing operations, managing costs, and navigating margin pressures. As Werner adapts to fluctuating market conditions, fleet adjustments and strategic changes remain key priorities.

Loading new replies...

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,057 messages 23,107 likes

Fuel prices are going to have to start dropping again. You can make as many efficiency improvements as possible but that's still our #1 killer next to salaries. And for me personally, fuel is more than I pay myself.

Reply 1 Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,684 messages 21,125 likes

Funny how things can be viewed differently, based on the operation.

With Werner operating primarily via contract freight, fuel surcharge is one of the key things they focus on in terms of lost revenue. In other words, lower fuel prices have hurt them

Reply Like

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,057 messages 23,107 likes

I mean yeah that's true. They hurt us too. But if we do have to be at the bottom, the further prices are below the minimum fuel surcharge, the better. The middle of the chart isn't really a good place to be. Often what they're using as the average is less than what we pay.

$5+ a gallon was actually a good thing for us, but they also took away a lot of our accessorials.

Reply Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,684 messages 21,125 likes

Was it really?

I mean, I get it. Higher fuel prices translates to higher fuel surcharges, and "temporarily" higher revenue.

Temporarily because eventually it chokes the businesses to buy and sell things (shippers and receivers). The result? lower contract rates overall, which all these big companies are filling now, after those of us in the spot market felt it first. Higher prices for the consumer to cover the increased costs which ultimately lowered demand because people can't afford things now. Again, lower contract rates.

We have quietly dropped down to rates that are lower than what I was getting on the spot market back in 2017. Meanwhile a tire is 50% higher in cost than it was back in 2017, as is a truck, trailer, and anything else you need to operate a trucking business.

The important note being hidden in reports like this from public trucking companies like this is that most of them, if not all of them, are not simply earning less money, they are losing money. If you spoke with any of the folks at the top of these companies and they responded honestly, they would likely be telling you that they are right on the edge of bankruptcy.

Think about it. When these companies put out these earning statements, they are forced to put out factual information, but at the same time, they have to present it in the most positive way possible.

There is nothing positive about a 10% reduction in fleet size for a trucking company.

Then, look at brokers. These folks are reducing their staff is massive numbers. Looking to eliminate as much overhead as possible at this point by going all in on automation. Look at CH Robinson and the article I just posted about them.

They are going all in on automation, and others are trying to do the same. This is being pushed much faster than they wanted to push it because they have no choice due to falling revenues and losing money.

And in every earnings report, they will try to direct your attention to a statement that the future is looking more solid. They do this because they fear people dumping their stock if they don't. But somehow, those positives continue to never show up.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,057 messages 23,107 likes

Yes, looking at our weekly settlements, higher fuel prices were better.

I'm not talking about the economy as a whole. That's far more complicated.

Reply Like

Duck

Sarcastic remark goes here

28,887 messages 39,717 likes

What happens when a one man operation like you sends a fuel surcharge bill to a customer or broker?

Reply Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,684 messages 21,125 likes

Fuel surcharges don’t specifically exist with spot market freight. They have an effect on where the rates are for a market, but not specifically charged.

Whatever rate I agree to for a spot market load is the all in rate I receive. It’s a one time contract for one load.

If I was to set up with a shipper to haul specific loads, it would be a base rate and include a surcharge for fuel. I don’t currently do any of those loads.

Reply 4 Likes

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,057 messages 23,107 likes

That was my experience as well. You're basically bidding one load at a time so surcharge becomes irrelevant.

If the rate is adequate, you agree to it. If it isn't, you don't.

The idea behind fuel surcharge is to not get screwed with fuel fluctuations over time when signing a long term dedicated contract. Single bid load boards are usually under a week so the fluctuations in fuel prices generally do not apply.

Reply 1 Like

×