Trucking Safety: Senator Hickenlooper Urges FMCSA for More Oversight

Senator John Hickenlooper is calling for stronger trucking safety measures in a letter sent to the FMCSA on September 10, 2024. He highlights serious gaps in current safety standards that put the public at risk. The letter specifically addresses issues like unlicensed drivers and the lack of proper safety audits for trucking companies.

Trucking Safety Risks

Hickenlooper’s letter points to a fatal accident in Colorado as evidence of these risks. In June, an unlicensed truck driver employed by a California-based company caused a deadly crash on U.S. Route 285 in Jefferson County. This tragic event underscores the danger posed by insufficient oversight of commercial driver licensure (CDL).

The senator believes this incident is part of a larger problem. He stresses that trucking safety audits and inspections aren’t happening often enough. The FMCSA, tasked with ensuring trucking safety on U.S. roads, may not have the resources it needs. Limited financial support and the large number of trucks on the road make it hard for the agency to audit companies thoroughly.

FMCSA Safety Audits and Oversight

The letter raises concerns about how many trucking companies are violating CDL requirements. Hickenlooper asks how many companies failed safety audits in the past two years. He also wants to know if those companies have made necessary safety improvements.

Hickenlooper questions the number of federal safety auditors employed by the FMCSA. He believes the agency needs more auditors to keep up with the growing demand for safety checks. He also suggests that Congress may need to give the FMCSA more resources or authority to strengthen its oversight.

The Impact on Trucking Safety

If the FMCSA takes action, it could lead to increased trucking safety audits and stricter CDL requirements. Companies might need to improve their hiring practices and ensure all drivers are properly licensed. These changes could reduce the risk of accidents and improve safety for everyone on the road.

Hickenlooper’s letter signals a shift in how the trucking industry may be regulated. The senator is calling for stricter enforcement to make sure companies comply with CDL and safety rules. Trucking companies that fail to meet these standards could face penalties or additional audits.

Conclusion

Trucking safety is at the forefront of Senator Hickenlooper’s concerns. His letter to the FMCSA calls for immediate action to improve safety standards and reduce the risk of accidents. As the FMCSA considers its response, trucking companies may need to prepare for increased oversight and stricter regulations. These efforts aim to protect the lives of both truck drivers and the public on U.S. roads.

This article highlights Senator Hickenlooper’s call for improved trucking safety and the potential impact on the trucking industry. His push for stricter CDL compliance and safety audits could lead to significant changes in how trucking companies operate.

Loading new replies...

Duck

Sarcastic remark goes here

28,963 messages 39,846 likes

From Wikipedia:

Hickenlooper calls himself "a fiscal conservative." He has said, "I don't think the government needs to be bigger. I think the government's got to work, and people have got to believe in government, and I think that's part of the problem," and "I think what a lot of Americans want is better government, not bigger government."​

Yet here he is, proposing more government. What a hypocrite.

Reply 3 Likes

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,661 messages 21,093 likes

So, you think the FMCSA is doing enough here?

Politics aside, unsafe trucks are running rampant out here.

I have had been an owner operator for several years now. 7 with my own authority. In those 7 years, I have never, EVER, had a vehicle inspection on my truck or trailer. I got one driver inspection (level 3) about 5 years ago, and two more in the last 3 months. Other than that, nothing.

The state of Arkansas make an error last year and suspended my truck registration. I had no idea. I was red lighted continuously at weigh stations, but never pulled in. The reason for the red light was the registration. I finally went inside one day to ask why I got the red light, and they told me. Yet they still let me go, as did every other scale that had pulled me in for the past couple weeks.

We have a huge percentage of small carriers out here (1 or 2 trucks) that are unable to work with many brokers due to zero inspections on file in the past two years. This is a red flag for many brokers now due to all the fraud and scamming going on.

The letter this senator wrote to FMCSA was largely due to accidents in his state being caused by not only unsafe equipment, but unlicensed drivers.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...
Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,244 messages 23,287 likes

I'd rather not be inspected because I trust myself, but I want everyone else to be inspected because I don't trust them.

Reply 1 Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,661 messages 21,093 likes

It becomes a different story with your own authority. The number of brokers automatically blocking you for this is continuing to grow. And for some, the driver inspections (level 3) is not enough either because your equipment hasn't been inspected.

At the very least, x amount of time since last registered inspection should require the truck be inspected. If the FMCSA could do this one thing, that would do wonders toward cleaning up the bad trucks and drivers from the road, as well as bringing freight rates back up.

Reply Like

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,244 messages 23,287 likes

I just want the world and government to leave me alone.

I had a few brokers tell me no but it wasn't for lack of inspections, it was for age of authority. Then when rates took a shit I decided it was no longer worth it, as did a few friends of mine.

Walmart said I could sign a contract with them if I had 10 trucks. No mention of inspections or age of authority. Just needed at least 10 trucks.

Reply Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,661 messages 21,093 likes

In an effort to have a decent discussion here in the forum about this topic,

Are you content with all trucks being left alone? Just leave it to the company to maintain their equipment as they see fit and hire whoever they want, licensed or not? Because that's what being left alone means. It doesn't work.

Reply Like

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,244 messages 23,287 likes

We have annual federal DOT inspections. Roadsides and scales are random fishing expeditions. 1 gets pulled over, 500 drive by.

People who know they're in violation will bypass a scale.

So to answer your question, no I don't want my safe truck pulled over getting scrutinized while 500 unsafe ones roll by.

Reply 1 Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,661 messages 21,093 likes

That means nothing. You can go into just about any tire shop or tons of shade tree shops and get someone that is a licensed inspector. What do they do? They fill out the form and send you on your way because they don't want to spend time actually inspecting your equipment when they have other things they can make money on.

Any company can get their own guy certified, which could easily mean a guaranteed good bill of health on every truck and trailer.

Reply 1 Like

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,244 messages 23,287 likes

I probably edited while you were quoting so read my full post this time. There's no good answer but making villains out of the good guys by having more feds wasting their time isn't it.

This is how you push out the good ones and only have bad ones left making the industry even worse.

Reply 1 Like

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,661 messages 21,093 likes

I read it now, and by doing what I said, your concerns would be addressed. Trucks that haven't been inspected in x amount of time will be red lighted and with a requirement to do so, would be inspected.

I don't want to be inspected either, that's the last thing I want to happen during the course of my day.

But I think the criteria I mentioned would clearly help. And the only people that can address that are those at FMCSA.

It's fine to be against something, such as bigger government. That said, when there are problems, solutions must be found and simply denying something that you are fundamentally against doesn't begin to address these problems.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,244 messages 23,287 likes

We should start with the Federal requirement to read speak and write English. Enforce that and a lot of our problems will go away.

Reply 4 Likes

×