US Xpress Extends Paycuts


Mike

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Jan 01, 2009 (Chattanooga Times/Free Press - McClatchy-Tribune via COMTEX) U.S. Xpress Enterprises will cut the pay of 1,700 employees and shorten the workweek for hourly workers.

While employees are not happy to see their paychecks shrink, some say they feel lucky to have work in the tough economic environment.

"I don't think anyone is happy, but given the options it beats being out of work," said Mike Kelly, who works in customer service at U.S. Xpress.

In late November, officials at the Chattanooga-based trucking company cut the pay of high-level employees by between 5 and 7 percent. On Wednesday, those cuts were increased for company management and extended to all nondriving employees, said Greg Thompson, a spokesman for U.S. Xpress.

Low-level employees will lose 5 percent from their paycheck, vice presidents will lose 7 percent and executive management will lose 10 percent, Mr. Thompson said.

Hourly employees will see their work hours reduced from 40 to 36 hours per week, said Mr. Thompson. There will not be a cut to the pay per mile that truck drivers receive, he said.

"We appreciate the fact that these steps will require our employees to do some further belt-tightening with their personal budgets," said Mr. Thompson. "However, this is a challenging time, and U.S. Xpress takes great pride that we have been able to minimize our staff reductions as thousands are losing jobs across the country."

Jeff Wardeberg, chief operating officer of U.S. Xpress, said the company hopes to save between $220,000 to $250,000 per month on these cost-saving measures.

Officials plan to lift the pay cut in six months -- or sooner if the economy rebounds, he said.

More than 7,000 trucking companies have gone out of business in the last few years, and Mr. Wardeberg wants to keep staff sizes as they are to avoid having to rehire and train staff in healthier economic times.

"We monitor the economic conditions and what we have seen is a continued slowdown, and we are concerned that unless we do something proactive now we might have to take more dramatic measures down the road," said Mr. Wardeberg. "I would rather ask for a pay reduction today than have to eliminate people in this environment."

With a pay cut, Mr. Kelly said he will likely have to trim $150 a month from his family budget.

"That eliminates eating out," he said.

But small sacrifices beat being out of work, he said. Mr. Kelly came to work at U.S. Xpress three months ago after leaving a local company that was reorganizing and looking for a job for six months.

"Any job in this environment is better than no job," he said.

To see more of the Chattanooga Times/Free Press, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to Chattanooga Times Free Press | Home Page. Copyright (c) 2009, Chattanooga Times/Free Press, Tenn. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email [email protected], call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.
 

Take notice the statement of no cut to drivers paid by the mile. Reason...they're already being paid below fair pay, that there's no need to cut the pay-per-mile rate.

' I'M MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!! '
-ss-
 
I'm not seeing these as good moves, but moves brought about through necessity to survive. Truly that is not good. If this government would have acted as we demanded a year ago...this may have been avoided. And I say "may," not "could have."

And do take notice...Mr. Kelly makes statement of cutting $150.00 in his budget, and only references eating out as what he will be sacrificing. Not whether he will now have to decide which bill gets paid when. Cuts are being made, and it's obvious this is being done out of a necessity of survival. But who truly is cutting the most for that survival? And in that cutting it is being made known the truckers paid by the mile are obviously at the bottom of the pay scale...any further cuts would only result in the loss of those truckers. And I will point out many truckers are already having to literally live in their trucks because they can't make enough to afford to maintain a home.

I find it amazing we, as an industry, continue to refuse to acknowledge the reality the majority of our truckers are not being compensated fairly for the hard work they do. The majority of us have thrown away our trucking ethic of "what effects one of us...effects all of us. Why is that?

' I'M MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!! '
-ss-
 
Truckers not being compensated is a great idea for another thread. I have actually made an attempt at this in the past and got virtually no responses from drivers who were willing to step up and admit how much they felt they were worth being out on the road.

---------------------
Anytime I see a company taking measures to stay in business on their own, without dumping all of their debts via bankruptcy, I see it has nothing but a good move. Yes, it is out of necessity, but at least they are doing it and staying afloat.

They could just totally sink, and those that are taking paycuts could be drawing zero money and standing in the free cheese line and/or sitting around drawing unemployment. Going out and getting another job would also be an option, but not many people are hiring, instead, they are letting people go on a daily basis.

I'm not seeing these as good moves, but moves brought about through necessity to survive. Truly that is not good. If this government would have acted as we demanded a year ago...this may have been avoided. And I say "may," not "could have."
 

Back
Top