C.H.Robinson $23.8 million


lunachic

BITE ME !
John D. Schulz, Contributing Editor -- Logistics Management, 4/9/2009

In a move that could have chilling repercussions for freight brokers and the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, an Illinois jury has awarded $23.8 million in damages against C.H. Robinson Worldwide, the nation's largest truck broker.

In what is believed to be the largest injury verdict ever in Will County, Ill., a jury recently awarded $23.8 million to three plaintiffs who sought compensation for two deaths and one serious injury that resulted from a 2004 vehicle accident near Plainfield, Ill.

The case involved a multiple vehicle accident on Interstate 55 in 2004. DeAnn Henry, the driver of a tractor trailer, lost control of the truck and rear-ended multiple vehicles. The collisions caused the deaths of two individuals, Joseph Sperl, 66, and Thomas Sanders, 42, and serious injuries to William Taluc, 30.

Henry was an independent contractor for Toad L. Dragonfly Express, a Utah-based trucking company hired by C.H. Robinson, one of the largest 3PLs in the country with $8.6 billion in revenue last year that handles 7.3 million shipments a year through 228 branches with 8,000 employees. The driver was later found to have been driving on a suspended license with falsified log books.

The jury found CHR to have “vicarious liability,” which meant that Dragonfly Express was considered part of the brokerage company instead of an independent contractor.

What other brokers and 3PLs fear is that this case could set a precedent to increase their liability and insurance premiums. CHR, which is planning an appeal, is insured through a $5 million deductible. If the award holds, analysts estimate it would mean about a 2-cent per share hit on CHR’s income per share.

The deep-pockets nature of this case is what other brokers and 3PLs fear. Fortunately for them, jury awards are not considered precedent-setting cases. Only judges’ rulings can set precedents in future cases, lawyers and other 3PL officials said.


Even though both the motor carrier and driver admitted liability, they had limited insurance coverage. That is what spurred lawyers at the Chicago-based Healy Law Firm to go after CHR, which argued that Henry was an independent contractor with no legal connection in this matter.
Angie Freedman, C.H. Robinson vice president, called the case a “tragic accident with very real losses for the families involved, but said CHR was not liable for the negligence of the carrier and driver.

“We do not believe that the facts of this case or the law support holding C.H. Robinson liable for the carrier’s and driver’s negligence, and we are disappointed with the jury’s decision and the damages awarded,” Freedman said. “There have been no allegations that C.H. Robinson was negligent or that our actions were unsafe.”


Freedman said CHR would “continue to pursue relief from the verdict through all available legal means,” likely through an appeal.

Martin Healy, a trucking and product liability attorney in
 

The driver was later found to have been driving on a suspended license with falsified log books.

Okay, so what's the question?

On the other hand...

$5 million deductible. If the award holds, analysts estimate it would mean about a 2-cent per share hit on CHR’s income per share.

The deep-pockets nature of this case is what other brokers and 3PLs fear.

Okay, if CH Robinson doesn't want, or isn't prepared to pay a 3mil deductible, they shouldn't carry one. Or at least screen thier carriers better.

Even though both the motor carrier and driver admitted liability, they had limited insurance coverage. That is what spurred lawyers at the Chicago-based Healy Law Firm to go after CHR, which argued that Henry was an independent contractor with no legal connection in this matter.

I believe the law firm was correct. You have an illegal driver, on illegal logbooks, and the people who are simply trying to move the load are responsible (meaning the shippers and the brokers)? Please. It is the driver's responsibility to make sure the load arrives intact, and safe. On time? Well, if you're going to run "by the book" then that's a different story, isn't it?

The driver is responsible for his/her own actions, and hours of service. I'm sure there was an APPOINTMENT, and that this load HAD TO BE THERE, but...the feds mandate HoS rules, not CH Robinson, not the dispatcher.

The reason we become truck drivers is to be as independent as we can, and to be responsible for ourselves.

How CH Robinson is held responsible for this is beyond me.
 
I'm pretty sure lunachic and all the drivers having to haul cheap freight are just heart-broken over what happened to C.H. Robinson.:nono:
Their liability in this case while not appearing to be directly connected is ironic. Ask any driver who has been driving the cheap freight rates. Wanna guess?
So, what do you get when you drive all the competent, well-equipped drivers out of business? Wanna guess again?
Let's just say Karma is alive and well.
 
When I dispatched, I dealt with a guy in a CH Robinson office in upstate NY. I always got real good paying frieght out of him, and he was never hesitant about throwing a few bucks my way to pass on to a driver for detention if loading took too long.

CH has a rep for being "Cheap" and "Heavy" but my brief time behind a desk tell me that all you have to do is find a good agent to deal with.

Luna, it looks to me like rebel was taking a jab at you...lol...either you missed it, or ignored it.

Their liability in this case while not appearing to be directly connected is ironic. Ask any driver who has been driving the cheap freight rates. Wanna guess?
So, what do you get when you drive all the competent, well-equipped drivers out of business? Wanna guess again?

Also...freakin' say something already. It's a discussion board.
 
When I dispatched, I dealt with a guy in a CH Robinson office in upstate NY. I always got real good paying frieght out of him, and he was never hesitant about throwing a few bucks my way to pass on to a driver for detention if loading took too long.

CH has a rep for being "Cheap" and "Heavy" but my brief time behind a desk tell me that all you have to do is find a good agent to deal with.

Luna, it looks to me like rebel was taking a jab at you...lol...either you missed it, or ignored it.



Also...freakin' say something already. It's a discussion board.

No, I really wasn't. I've heard lunachic and a few others bitch about C.H.'s rates and when that happens, you get what ya pay for.
To be fair, I don't know any more about them than what I've read here.
If it is true then their chickens have come home to roost.

It may have been my poor wording though when I said "who has been driving the cheap rates".
What I was referring to was C.H. "driving" the rates down, not people "driving" for their rates.
 

Back
Top