24 States Oppose California’s EPA Waiver Request

A coalition of 24 states has formally opposed California’s attempt to enforce stricter emissions standards on visiting trucks. On September 16, 2024, the states submitted a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The group, led by Nebraska, argues that California’s Advanced Clean Fleets regulation would create costly complications for truckers traveling through the state.

What is the Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation?

California’s Advanced Clean Fleets regulation requires medium- and heavy-duty trucks to transition to zero-emission vehicles. This includes a mandate that drayage trucks must be zero-emission by 2035, with all trucks in California to follow by 2045, where feasible.

But the regulation has a critical early deadline. Starting in 2025, any trucking company with 50 or more vehicles, or $50 million in gross annual revenue, will need to begin replacing its fleet with electric trucks. This aggressive timeline has sparked serious concerns among interstate truckers and companies who frequently operate in California.

The Coalition’s Argument

The 24-state coalition, which includes states like Texas, Alabama, and Indiana, opposes California’s request for a Clean Air Act waiver that would allow it to enforce these stricter emissions rules. The states argue that the mandate would have a national impact, affecting trucking companies across the country.

For companies operating in multiple states, complying with California’s rules means adding costly electric trucks to their fleets. Battery-electric rigs cost significantly more than diesel trucks, and the infrastructure needed to support them—such as charging stations—is limited. The states claim this will disrupt supply chains and increase the cost of goods.

Moreover, the regulation specifically targets large fleets, which make up a significant portion of the trucking industry. Any company with 50 or more vehicles or $50 million in revenue will be forced to comply, even if they do not primarily operate in California. This, according to the coalition, is a burden that many fleets simply cannot afford.

Impact on Truckers and the Industry

Truck drivers and fleet operators will feel the effects if the EPA grants the waiver. Larger trucking companies will face expensive fleet upgrades as early as 2025, and this could affect trucking rates, delivery times, and even jobs. With fewer routes available due to the lack of charging infrastructure, truckers may see their ability to transport goods efficiently diminished.

The coalition also argues that this regulation is unconstitutional. The Clean Air Act’s waiver provision applies only to California, giving it special regulatory powers no other state has. The group believes this violates the principle of equal sovereignty and would unfairly allow California to dictate national trucking standards.

Looking Ahead

The EPA is reviewing California’s waiver request, and public hearings are expected. Trucking companies and industry professionals should monitor the situation closely. The decision could dramatically impact how fleets operate in California and potentially set a precedent for other states to follow.

Conclusion

The Advanced Clean Fleets regulation could reshape the trucking industry, especially for companies with larger fleets or significant revenue. As the EPA considers the waiver, this challenge from 24 states highlights the complex balance between environmental goals and the economic realities of interstate commerce.

Loading new replies...

Hammer166

Instigateur №166™

4,401 messages 7,492 likes

It's frankly a surprise that some court hasn't already slapped California down for interfering with Interstate commerce with their emissions bs. One of the big reasons we became a constitutional republic instead of staying a confederacy was to have uniform commerce among the states, enforced by the federal govt.

Reply 3 Likes

Mike

Well-Known Member

26,684 messages 21,124 likes

It has been said by many, for quite some time, that all of this power that was given to California in regards to emissions needs to all be revoked. It was a bad decision, and it needs to be reversed.

If that link works, it will make your head spin.

Reply 3 Likes

click to expand...
Duck

Sarcastic remark goes here

28,869 messages 39,690 likes

Every new round of totalitarian bullshit in California comes with people saying "just quit going to California. When their store shelves are empty, they'll give it up" but few actually do.

Every time drivers comply with California BS it only encourages them to cram even more BS down the people's throats.

Obedience is implied consent.

They banned leased owner/operators & now they're trying to ban diesel trucks entirely.

Y'all who continue to haul in & out of California, this is your fault.

Reply Like

Electric Chicken

Well-Known Member

27,029 messages 23,077 likes

Agreed. I hate that most of our freight comes in via California ports so I'm a little complicit myself. Fortunately I'm actually helping destroy the US Economy as a whole by propping up China so that makes it better.

Edit: I have a slightly different take on the lease up thing. I think that's one thing they got right. Only because it's my understanding lease ops still exist, but carriers are no longer able to treat them like forced dispatch company drivers.

If it completely obliterated the option for real, that kinda sucks. But when these companies treat an owner op like a company driver, that sucks even more.

Reply Like

krelithous

Well-Known Member

12,798 messages 4,748 likes

How much do you wanna bet that they will pull some stupid shit like drivers can't cross the boarders if there not driving an electric truck. like they did in 2007-2010 with the emissions trucks :biglaugh: :coocoo::biglaugh::stare1:. how are we saving the planet :confused-96: ever see the emissions caused to make ev's :confused-96: then they catch fire and burn to the ground😀. and when the batteries reach there end of life there hard to recycle if at all possible. the same with the emissions trucks to many computers to much to go wrong and costly to fix vs an old school motor!!!

Reply 1 Like

krelithous

Well-Known Member

12,798 messages 4,748 likes

i have a different look on AB-5 while it prevents carriers from screwing drivers over. i would say it's mainly taxes!!! there's work arounds for AB-5 if you have no ties to commieforina

Reply Like

×